# statute of limitations on mesothelioma claims

Tafflin v. Levitt, 493 U.S. 455 (1990) » Tafflin v. Levitt: State courts can have concurrent jurisdiction over federal claims except when the interests of the state and federal governments cannot be reconciled or when the statute giving rise to the claim or its legislative history suggest otherwise. Supreme.justia.com

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. v. USA, No. 1:2020cv00499 - Document 152 (Fed. Cl. 2022) » GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. v. USA, No. 1:2020cv00499 - Document 152 (Fed. Cl. 2022) case opinion from the US Court of Federal Claims Law.justia.com

United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966) » United Mine Workers v. Gibbs: A federal court has discretion to review a state claim when there is a substantial federal claim in the same action, and the relationship between the federal claim and the state claim suggests that the entire action comprises one case. Supreme.justia.com

12 U.S. Code § 343 - Discount of obligations arising out of actual commercial transactions » All such discounts for any participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility shall be subject to such limitations, restrictions, and … Law.cornell.edu

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc., 545 U.S. 546 (2005) » Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.: So long as one plaintiff meets the amount in controversy requirement, a federal court may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over sufficiently related claims that do not meet the amount in controversy requirement. Supreme.justia.com

JxMx v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust. Fieldfisher secures a child claimant’s right to anonymity » The Court of Appeal have today handed down judgement in the much anticipated case of JxMx and the judgement is fantastic news for Claimants involved in personal Fieldfisher.com

International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) » International Shoe v. State of Washington: Personal jurisdiction is constitutional when a defendant has minimum contacts with the state where a lawsuit is brought such that notions of fair play and substantial justice would not be offended. Supreme.justia.com